The moment England left these shores for South Africa a few weeks ago, there was much expectation that at long last, the team could bring the trophy home. Nonetheless, that dream was destroyed in no uncertain terms by the old enemy Germany in Bloemfontein as England crashed out of the competition losing 4-1. How could possibly such an experienced team who qualified so effortlessly fail to perform? Not surprisingly, the English media has put together no lack of scape goats and factors for what was England’s worst defeat at a World Cup. There has been sufficient talk about the Italian manager, formations and more but the troubles are a great deal deeper.
Since its formation in 1992, the EPL has achieved terrific success as an international brand. The cost of this success has been felt by English football. Improved TV earnings has forced wages to increase. Consequently this has meant there has been an expanding divide involving club and country. Teams pay their players a great deal of money and are increasingly more reluctant to let their footballers play for their countries.
In turn, footballers get hugely rewarded by Premier League clubs to the extent that success is recognised by securing money-spinning contracts as a substitute for anything they accomplish on the field. Typical players who rarely turn out for their clubs are still millionaires and as these footballers put money ahead of playing matches at club level, there is certainly little doubt they do not have the mental strength or hunger to play international football.
In the past, there was always a regional reserve league which ensured young footballers from smaller clubs may be guaranteed to play versus decent reserve teams from larger teams like Arsenal, Tottenham and Man Utd. Of course, in recent years, the EPL has changed which means they will only play versus other Premiership reserve teams. This means that Championship reserve teams no longer get to play versus EPL sides. For teams like Ipswich Town, it means their reserve team now plays against Stevenage rather than Tottenham and this drop in standard in opposition little doubt has a negative effect on the footballing education of young players.
With such a lot of money on the line, everything is geared to EPL survival. Teams spend fortunes recruiting theoretically better foreign managers and players in a bid to retain their Premiership status. The ambition of promoted teams to the Premier League extends no further than finished 4th bottom. The Premier League cash bonanza means that EPL clubs can give you £1-2m for young players at lower division teams. The footballers are keen to move and secure their financial futures but it may perhaps also signal the finish of their careers. The young Crystal Palace star joined Spurs but barely made an appearance and was last heard of on loan at Brentford, a league lower than when he was at Crystal Palace. From a football mind-set, Bostock would have been best served staying at Palace and learning the game. How many more young players careers are cut down like this chasing the money rather than playing the fixture? Its difficult to blame the young footballers for taking the money.
There is also the popular accusation that teams play too many games in England and more and more managers want a winter break. Even so, footballers don’t look to be tired after asked to fly off to the Usa or Far East on pre-season tours. Or how about England’s friendly game next June away in Thailand?
There are simply too many ready made excuses for failure that footballers are ready to accept. They live a life well away from the real world with their mansions, sports cars and trophy wives. Put simply, there is not enough hunger or desire.
The match in Thailand also shows another hassle. In addition to the EPL being a global brand, so are the England team. Supporters want to watch the big Premiership stars play for England and in friendlies like this, those stars will be expected, if not contracted, to turn out. Having said that, it is not the case that the very best 11 players make the best team. Too a large number of players are in the team based on standing rather than performances. Young players should be promoted into the senior squad sooner.
For the imminent Euro 2012 campaign, England should do away with the services of all players aged 30 or over. None of them have played to their ability in South Africa thus why should we persist with them. It would be far better to promote younger footballers who may still be hungry for success. All the same, while the worshiping of the EPL persists, things are probably not going to get better anytime swiftly.